Hello and greetings to all OVMRC members and supporters! September is upon us and the new Club season has started.
Several changes have occurred during the break, most notably the removal of Club repeater VE3TWO and repeater VE3MPC from service due to the loss of facilities at the RCMP establishment in Orléans. This has necessarily forced some of the usual nets we frequent to move off to other repeaters, particularly the Phoenix Net and Pete’s Café now being hosted on VE2CRA, 146.94/34, 100 Hz.
The OVMRC 2 m. FM Net is moving to repeater VE3OCE, 146.88/28, 136.5 Hz. Perhaps it’s fortunate that the net took a break over the summer, so there was no scramble for facilities to keep things going. The net will begin once more with the start of the new season on September 9 at 8 p.m. Also a reminder that anyone in the Club who wants to take a turn at hosting the 2 m. net from time to time is most welcome to do so. Simply send me an email indictating when you’d like to give it a go.
The Sunday Pothole Net continued after Field Day 2021 on an unchanged schedule, continuing to provide a forum for passing items of news and interest to our group. Thanks go out to Ernie, VE3EJJ, and Glenn, VE3XRA, for co-hosting the Pothole Net through a second summer thus keeping the net going continuously since the Autumn of 2019. The slow increase in sun spot activity appears to be having a positive effect on 80 m. propagation, so give it a try if you can, all are welcome. The net meets every Sunday morning at 10 a.m. Ottawa time, 3760 kHz., LSB.
Roger Rose, VE3XRR, who served as Net Control for the Pot Lid Slow Speed CW Net has decided to retire from that position as of June 2021, following many years as host of the PLN. A call for volunteers to take over the role of PLN Net Control has been open since Roger’s announcement to retire however no takers have come forward as of this writing. Normally, the PLN would start the new season on September 12, but with no controller it is likely to go defunct. That’s not to say there won’t be people checking in on Sunday mornings 11 a.m. for a CW rag chew on 3620 kHz. but it will be informal unless and until someone decides to take Net Control duties.
Lastly, the Digital Experimental Net that I started up in November 2020 has not attracted much participation so it may also cease activity if there’s no interest. The DEXNet meets on Sunday evening at 7:30 p.m. Ottawa time and will start the 2021-22 season on 6 metres, 50.750 MHz., horizontal pol., check-in is on BPSK-31. This is a move from operation on 2 metres last year, with a view that many potential participants had no SSB capability on 2, but are more likely to have it on 6. This remains to be seen.
As always, Club members’ comments and suggestions are welcome for improvements or modifications to the OVMRC nets. Please send all net-related correspondence to my email – firstname.lastname@example.org.
A hearty hello to all OVMRC members! Most readers will be aware, following our ZOOM meeting of October 21, that participation in the club-sponsored nets continues to go strong and we certainly continue to have a wide range of discussion topics. The Thursday 2 metre net has been accommodating an ad-hoc swap segment recently as part of the ragchew second round and, I might say, has met with a certain level of success. Barry, VE3NA, has unloaded a few items and Frank VE3YY got an immediate taker for a can of RF shielding paint. So, if you have stuff laying around for sale or giveaway, or are looking for something to acquire, remember that the opportunity is there by joining the 2 metre net on VE3TWO each Thursday night at 8 pm.
A similar opportunity for friendly ragchew and buy/sell continues on the Pot Hole Net, Sunday mornings at 10 am, 3760 kHz. LSB. Please join in with Ernie, VE3EJJ, and Glenn, VE3XRA, to catch up on the latest news from the Club and participants.
Club members who may have an interest in legacy and recent developments in digital communication take note – I have a proposal to start a new net, The DEXNET (Digital Experimental Net), in next couple of weeks. The purpose of this net will be to provide a venue for hams in Ottawa-Outaouais to try out some of the data modes supported by such software as FLDigi and are finding popularity on the HF bands. There are a few logistics questions I need to address so, to that end, a poll has been created on the OVMRC groups.io internet site and I invite all OVMRC members who may be interested in participating in DEXNET to lodge their preferences on this poll. It is open now and will close on Friday, October 30 at 10 pm. Ottawa time.
My thanks to everyone who continues to support and participate in the OVMRC FM and SSB voice nets, you’re all making being part of OVMRC a fun and educational experience.
Hugo Kneve, VE3KTN, Chair, OVMRC Nets & Radio Operations
I suppose this could have been written as an article for the June Rambler, but that might be a bit late for the tale I’m about to tell which is my 24-hour experiment in running a Class 1E/QRP/Battery+Solar station for 2020 Field Day. In the 42 years of holding an Amateur Certificate, I’ve never run Field Day as an individual from home – it’s always been as a participant with my local club, so this is something new to me. Before getting into it, you might want to brew a large coffee so as to better enjoy an uninterrupted reading.
How Do The Bands Look?
From the get-go, and having had some fun working both sporadic E and meteor scatter on 6 m., I thought this might be an interesting band to work for Field Day with a QRP/Battery setup. Wrong. Over the past 24 hours, I’ve lost count how many FT8 CQ’s I sent out and received only one response. Thank you Guy, VE3QC, for answering my CQ on Tuesday morning – it made my day. Even though there was something of an opening for about 5 minutes at 10:15 EDT, I got no response to my CQ’s during that favourable period. OK, so I get it – 6 m. QRP from my yard with a dipole is not likely to get me a lot of points. Even using the 6 m. dipole, I was seeing far more signals on 80, 40 and 20 with 20 being active even into the bleak hours after midnight. So it looks like it’s going to be 20m FT8 for me.
I’m now in the process of building a take-down 20 m. vertical with four radials. It’s a quick and easy antenna to build and is, in my view, in the spirit of rapid deployment emergency operations. I had enough #12 bare stranded antenna wire to cut 4x quarter wave radials and a length of #14 bare stranded for the 17 ft. vertical radiator which will be black-taped to 5 sections of surplus fibreglass tent poles.
Radios and Batteries and Chargers …. Oh My!
I decided to run a QRP operation in order to maximise my score multiplier, and QRP means there’s also a chance of running entirely off battery for the whole 24 hours, so the experiment was on. I’d already built a backup lead-acid car battery gadget for the home station consisting essentially of the battery, a plastic marine battery box, a dashboard type voltmeter (the round black thing embedded in the lid), a 300W AC inverter and assorted connectors.
The inverter is cheap and nasty, delivering a really ugly A.C. square wave, but it’s at least 100 V. with the battery at 11.5 V. and won’t quit until the D.C. input reaches 10.7 V. which is far lower than I’d dare discharge a lead-acid. Despite the waveform, my Alinco 30 A. power supply and the charger for my laptop don’t get upset; they worked fine over the 18 hours when the whole rig was powered up. The laptop ran from its own battery until it dropped to 10% state of charge and it was only then that I plugged in the charger. More on that later.
The lead-acid battery dropped to 11.5 V. toward the end of the 24 hours with the radio transmitting at 5 W. so, apparently, I could run the entire FD on battery. The FT-991A probably would run at 11.7 V., but only just, which is why I decided to have the Alinco power supply connected to the inverter and have it provide a regulated 13.8 V. to the radio regardless of battery voltage. It’s a bit inefficient energy-wise, but I’d sooner protect my expensive radio. Even though the battery kept up over 24 hours, I decided to dip into my 2020 Ham Radio Crazy Money Fund and bought a 100W solar panel, including a 30A PWM charge controller, with the intention of connecting that to the battery in order to keep it charged best as possible. Now you can all blame me for the rain and dark clouds we’re going to have on Field Day. Here’s the entire planned setup for my 1E/QRP/Bat operation:
Operating FT8 requires fairly rigorous synchronisation to UTC; I think you need to be within at least one second of UTC or risk losing most incoming messages because of time sync skew. I have a Pharos GPS-500 receiver puck that’s maybe 10 years old and does have some difficulty with locking to GPS, but it does work and that’s what I’m going to use for time sync.
More important is the software application that interprets the GPS messages from the receiver and automatically syncs the PC clock. I use BktTimeSync (BTS) Version 1.11.1 which, for all its bugs and instability, works well enough and has some features I think are important for FD operation. The big feature is that BTS can operate in the absence of both GPS and NTP time sources and serve as a strictly manual means to set the PC’s clock. What’s important for WSJT-X and FT8 is that your clock is aligned with the clocks of everybody else on the air so, theoretically, the presence of GPS, WWV, CHU and the like is not absolutely necessary. What is necessary is that your PC clock is aligned with the clocks of everybody else – BTS has a feature to trim your clock by as little as .01 second to get that alignment. All you’d need do is to adjust your clock with the BTS “Manual Set” control until you start seeing messages come through on WSJT-X and note the “DT” values of incoming messages. Simply trim your PC clock until the average of all the DT’s is near to zero. My laptop can free run without a GPS adjustment for 2 hours before its clock drifts by 0.2 second, so not too much worry there.
Running a Laptop On Battery
Again, the name of the game here is to adjust the battery usage settings and close all unnecessary applications from running on your laptop in order to maximise its battery time. My HP Elitebook 840G1 with a SSD can get 4 hours before the battery drops to a 10% state of charge and starts complaining about connecting a charger. What I did discover was that the recharge time from 10 to 90% took about 70 minutes but going from 90% to 100% took another 50 minutes. Seems that it would be much more efficient from an energy consumption point of view to stop charging at 90% and take the slight hit on discharge capacity. The laptop charger does get quite warm, even when running from commercial power, so that’s energy wasted and I can live with a 90% state of charge if it means burning too much primary battery power to get to 100%. Here’s what I measured for discharge/charge times:
Well, there it is folks. These are the things I discovered in doing a Field Day Class 1E simulation; I hope there’s something of use for those who are planning something similar with Classes B, C and E. There may be more to discover when my solar panel arrives and how much additional energy storage margin it will provide.
This weeks AMSAT news included an item advising that Stanford University is now dedicating its “folding@home” distributed computing application to determining the protein binding mechanism of the COVID-19 virus which, it is hoped, would lead to development of a vaccine or other mitigating therapy. You can find the link easily enough by searching for “folding@home” and picking the link to Stanford’s web site. Please join the fight. The more of us volunteering our idle computer time to this effort, the better chance we have at getting a handle on this disease.